Analysis of The Kids Are All Right :: essays research papers

Analysis of The Kids Are All Right by Susan FaludiKids argon crawling around in the dirt, screaming, and have not except had their diapers changed because the solar day care provider seems to be in a trance watching the latest episode of the Montel Williams show. One of the workers strikes a child because she wont stop crying about how hungry she is. The other worker just sits in her chair drinking Jack Daniels with a little Coke immix in. Not all is well at the Wee World Child Center. But is this the impression that the public perceives of our daycare system in America?Well, around people would say that this is how only a few daycares are run. But many people would still state that kids who have not been in daycare have a better chance at a more enjoyable life than those who have. Susan Faludi, who frequently writes about womens issues and is the author of Backlash The undeclared War Against American Women, promotes daycare as an enhancement in a childs life. In her essay, The Kids Are All Right, she claims that kids who attend daycare are more social, experimental, self-assured, cooperative and creative. Faludis aim is convincing because she provides solid authoritative sources, gives personal examines of other girls who have been in day care, and refutes other researchers claims. Susan Faludi dives right into her argument and hits us with an informative source. Faludi cites Alison Clarke-Stewart, a professor of social ecology at the University California at Irvine, who found that social and intellectual development of children in day care was six to nine months ahead of children who stayed at home. This source is reliable because the author of the statement is an expert in the field of social ecology. Therefore this is an opinionative informative source because the researcher could be biased toward one side of the argument or the other. This matters to Faludi because audience could question the reliability of the source. Susan Faludi also cites perso nal experience in the form of interviews done by Delores Gold and David Andres in paragraph number two. The interviews of the girls provide not only data on childcare accountability, besides also serve to put a personal and more intimate effect on the argument. The interviews have a great effect on the contributor because they are grounded in reality and have been conducted by experienced researchers.