Nonreligious bases for nonviolences Research Paper

Nonreligious bases for nonviolences - Research Paper Example n in use for a long time, mainly by pacifists and non-pacifists, as a means of acquiring a social change and expression of resistance to any kind of oppression. In the past, the thought of non violence had made large numbers of people think and had attracted many followers. However, most non violent forms or cases have been in response to events of violence (PPU, n.d.). Non violence has usually been dived into two distinct parts or methods. The first one is the abstention from violence on religious grounds, while the second is the actions of people who neither start nor respond to any type of violence. Such kind of behavior has usually been linked to pacifism and abstinence of violence on grounds of principle (Riff, 1990, p. 166). Historically, western belief had an idea that non violence is something which can only be practiced by the educated masses, but this had been proved wrong in India, where the followers of Mahatma Gandhi were largely the poor farmers and uneducated masses (G regg, 1959, p. 184). In the following pages the various forms of non violence, apart from religious grounds, have been discussed. Also discussed are the contributions of some of the greatest preachers of non violence in the history of mankind. In this paper, the discussion has aimed to show how historically non violence had persistently fought the various types of violence on grounds which were not related to religion and the various forms of non violence prevalent in the world. The discussion also shoes how great leaders like Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King had contributed to world peace through their non violent methods. Various cases of non violent action have been found in many countries over time, but it was only in the 19th century that non-violent action started to take different names and forms. The term ‘strike’ as devised at he beginning of the nineteenth century in the United States of America and it meant an organized form of stoppage of work or withdrawal of

'English Law does not normally impose liability for failure to act Assignment

'English Law does not normally impose liability for failure to act despite the fact that there may be compelling moral justifications for doing so. Critically discuss this statement - Assignment Example This is one of the questionable areas of tort law. For instance, if a person sees a child drowning in a pool but does nothing to save him, they would not be held liable. However, if that person jumps in the water to save the child and acts negligently while doing so hence causing harm, they would be held liable for the harm caused due to their negligence. This paper discusses whether it is fair and justified for English law to not impose any liability upon failure to act, and the extent to which it collides with moral principles. It would be seen that the law actually does not violate any moral principles. It rather preserves the freedom of choice for people as they are in the best position to judge their own ability. If one is able to save someone, they may same them. But where one is incapable of saving someone, they should not be forced by law to save them. It is not that failure to act always escapes liability under English law: there are a few exceptions where courts do impose a liability. The most common are the circumstances where there is a special relationship e.g. parental, conjugal, doctor-patient. between the plaintiff and the defendant. Innkeepers, common carriers and certain other business relationships are also covered in this category. Defendants have an affirmative duty to act on the plaintiffs’ behalf and prevent injury where there is such a relation. Another exception is the one that is briefly mentioned above: there is no liability for not acting but once the defendant decides to act, they must do so in a reasonable way so as to avoid any harm that may be caused to the plaintiff due to the defendant’s negligence. Also, where the defendant has a control over land, a third party, or dangerous things that can cause harm to the plaintiff, the defendant has a duty to act and stop the danger. It can be said that maybe the establishment of duty does coincide with moral principles. In Home Office v Dorset Yacht Co